In the intricate dance of organizational succession planning, the question of whether to pre-inform staff about their potential ascent to leadership roles looms large, fraught with both promise and peril. It is a conundrum that treads the fine line between transparency and expectation management. While transparency advocates herald the virtues of openness and empowerment, proponents of discretion warn of pitfalls such as premature expectation and team discord.
The importance of succession planning in a going concern cannot be overemphasized. The heightened global talent mobility based off myriad of reasons makes the need for short to medium term bench strength a necessity than nice to have.
So here are the questions:
- Should staff members be pre-informed that they are potential successors to specific portfolios within an organisation?
- If they should be, at what stage should they be informed and what should they know?
- What is the risk from both sides of the coin?
- What role does internal and external culture play in both context?
Download Succession Planning Tool-kit by clicking on the image
To delve deeper into this debate, let’s explore some real-life risks associated with pre-informing staff about their succession potential.
Jealousy and Resentment: Imagine a scenario where a high-potential employee is pre-informed about their succession potential. Despite their qualifications and dedication, other team members may perceive this revelation as preferential treatment, leading to feelings of jealousy and resentment. This toxic undercurrent can erode team cohesion and impede collaboration, ultimately undermining organizational effectiveness. Better still, the potential successor becoming too eager to step-in and allows his or her mind to run wild on shortcuts. There is more that can be discussed here. However, let’s leave it to our imaginations.
Stifled Innovation: Consider the case of a talented individual who is informed of their potential succession to a leadership role. Armed with this knowledge, he/she becomes cautious and risk-averse, fearing that any misstep could jeopardize his/her prospects. This aversion to risk-taking can stifle innovation and creativity, hampering the organization’s ability to adapt to changing market dynamics and seize emerging opportunities.
Overconfidence and Complacency: Picture a scenario where an employee is pre-informed of their succession potential early in their career. Buoyed by this vote of confidence, they may become complacent, resting on their laurels instead of continuously striving for excellence. This overconfidence can breed a sense of entitlement and inhibit personal and professional growth, ultimately hindering their readiness for leadership roles.
Mismatched Expectations: Consider a scenario where an employee is pre-informed about their potential succession but lacks a clear understanding of the expectations and responsibilities associated with leadership roles. Without proper guidance and support, they may harbor unrealistic expectations about the nature of their future role, setting themselves up for disappointment and disillusionment.
What about the risk of not pre-informing them?
Talent Drain: Imagine a scenario where top performers are unaware of their potential for advancement within the organization. Without clarity about their future prospects, they may feel undervalued and disengaged, prompting them to seek opportunities elsewhere. This talent drain can undermine organizational continuity and competitiveness, as key individuals depart in search of greener pastures where their potential is recognized and nurtured.
Morale and Motivation: Consider the case of employees who are kept in the dark about their succession potential. In the absence of clear career paths and advancement opportunities, they may experience feelings of stagnation and disillusionment. This lack of motivation can manifest as decreased productivity, increased absenteeism, and diminished morale, ultimately eroding organizational culture and performance.
Missed Development Opportunities: Without knowledge of their potential for advancement, employees may forego opportunities for skill development and career growth. They may opt out of leadership training programs, mentorship opportunities, or stretch assignments that could enhance their readiness for future roles. This reluctance to invest in personal and professional development can impede organizational succession planning efforts, leaving a gap in leadership pipeline readiness.
Cultural Mistrust and Speculation: In environments where succession plans are shrouded in secrecy, rumors and speculation can run rampant. Employees may speculate about the criteria for advancement, question the fairness of selection processes, and harbor mistrust towards leadership. This atmosphere of uncertainty can breed cynicism, erode trust, and undermine employee engagement and loyalty.
Resistance to Change: When employees are blindsided by sudden leadership transitions or promotions, they may react with resistance and apprehension. The lack of forewarning can create a sense of instability and insecurity, triggering resistance to change and hindering the smooth transition of leadership responsibilities. This resistance can manifest as internal strife, decreased morale, and disruptions to organizational effectiveness.
Bridging the risks associated with pre-informing and not pre-informing staff about their succession potential requires a balanced and strategic approach that integrates elements of transparency, discretion, and proactive talent management. Here are some key strategies to navigate this delicate balance:
Transparent Communication Framework: Establish a transparent communication framework that outlines the organization’s approach to succession planning and advancement opportunities. Clearly articulate the criteria for identifying potential successors, the timeline for succession planning processes, and the avenues for feedback and discussion. This framework should foster open dialogue and clarity while respecting confidentiality where necessary.
Individualized Development Plans: Implement individualized development plans for high-potential employees, regardless of whether their succession potential has been disclosed. Work closely with employees to identify their career aspirations, strengths, and areas for growth. Provide tailored development opportunities, such as training programs, mentorship, and stretch assignments, to enhance their readiness for future roles.
Feedback and Performance Reviews: Incorporate regular feedback and performance reviews into the succession planning process. Offer constructive feedback to employees on their progress, potential, and areas for improvement. Use performance evaluations as an opportunity to discuss career goals, aspirations, and the alignment of individual development plans with organizational needs.
Cultivate a Growth Mindset: Foster a culture of continuous learning and growth throughout the organization. Encourage employees to embrace challenges, seek feedback, and pursue opportunities for skill development and career advancement. Cultivate a growth mindset that values resilience, adaptability, and a willingness to learn from both successes and setbacks.
Balanced Approach to confidentiality: Strike a balance between confidentiality and transparency in succession planning. While it’s important to maintain discretion to avoid unnecessary anxiety and speculation, be mindful of the potential consequences of keeping employees in the dark about their succession potential. Consider disclosing succession plans to individuals who have demonstrated readiness and receptivity to leadership opportunities, while respecting the need for confidentiality in sensitive situations.
Clear Pathways for advancement: Provide clear pathways for advancement within the organization. Develop transparent career ladders or progression frameworks that outline the criteria and expectations for moving into higher-level roles. Ensure that employees have access to information about available opportunities, required qualifications, and the support available for career development.
Emphasize Organizational Values and Culture: Ground succession planning efforts in the organization’s values and culture. Emphasize the importance of integrity, fairness, and inclusivity in all aspects of talent management, including succession planning. Ensure that decisions related to succession are made with a commitment to equity, diversity, and meritocracy.
While you ponder on the question how to manage the subject of transparency and discreetness in succession planning, you can access a Succession Planning Tool-kit by clicking on the image below:
